It is always mandatory to have retirements in any sector so as to bring in a fresh leash of life in the form of vibrant youth.Experience is something that any organization should have in order to hold its act together but then there are times when you need fresh legs.In our country experience is a term that is often misinterpreted or wrongly portrayed.Experience as of our contextual understanding is the age factor more than anything.But we have to understand clearly the very difference between age and experience.I did my post graduate education in kerela-the god's own country as they may fondly call it.
The very place is the epicentre of communism and voices of rights in India.There isn't any state that is so very attached to hold on to its human rights and employees so dear as like this wonderful state.But then we always see the state under performing or performing badly compared to its potential interms of national growth.Why is this so?.Well I have my own reasons for it.The state proudly says that it has the largest number of trade unions in the country which is a fair reason as to say why the state is very habitual to most of its labor force.The people who cross an age aren't chucked out of the system even if they underperform .The brothers of the labor union tend to go fight for their brethren when there is a sacking around the corner.This is a double edged sword.Though they cling on to the rights of theirs,they tend to forget that there need to be someone who bells the cat.
The people once they cross an age should be retired and if they underperform they can be retired too.My point is simple.Give people chances to perform even if they fail a couple of times.Back them up,but not at the expense of your downfall.There is only a very acute difference between foolishness and gut when it comes to backing up underperformers.I may be a bit harsh but being a young lad and someone who is itching to go on and make history,people of my age expect the oldies to retire if the job is burdening them
If they can't do it leave way.We can come and turn the tables.We are good at doing it too.We are a generation expecting opportunities.If we have a look at the way the government offices work on e really feels that atleast a quarter of them needs to be laid off.But they hang on and make a lot of money too.Why can't we take tough decisions.Of course they have done wonderful things to the workplace during their prime,but now the point is,they are more of excess baggage in a sinking boat.We need fresh guys to row the rudders.Bring in the youth and retire the oldies.The oldies as i really mean are the ones who aint doing any work and are useless.Those who work their asses off are always young according to me.The situation will only change when there are graceful exits rather than pinkslips.
The very place is the epicentre of communism and voices of rights in India.There isn't any state that is so very attached to hold on to its human rights and employees so dear as like this wonderful state.But then we always see the state under performing or performing badly compared to its potential interms of national growth.Why is this so?.Well I have my own reasons for it.The state proudly says that it has the largest number of trade unions in the country which is a fair reason as to say why the state is very habitual to most of its labor force.The people who cross an age aren't chucked out of the system even if they underperform .The brothers of the labor union tend to go fight for their brethren when there is a sacking around the corner.This is a double edged sword.Though they cling on to the rights of theirs,they tend to forget that there need to be someone who bells the cat.
The people once they cross an age should be retired and if they underperform they can be retired too.My point is simple.Give people chances to perform even if they fail a couple of times.Back them up,but not at the expense of your downfall.There is only a very acute difference between foolishness and gut when it comes to backing up underperformers.I may be a bit harsh but being a young lad and someone who is itching to go on and make history,people of my age expect the oldies to retire if the job is burdening them
If they can't do it leave way.We can come and turn the tables.We are good at doing it too.We are a generation expecting opportunities.If we have a look at the way the government offices work on e really feels that atleast a quarter of them needs to be laid off.But they hang on and make a lot of money too.Why can't we take tough decisions.Of course they have done wonderful things to the workplace during their prime,but now the point is,they are more of excess baggage in a sinking boat.We need fresh guys to row the rudders.Bring in the youth and retire the oldies.The oldies as i really mean are the ones who aint doing any work and are useless.Those who work their asses off are always young according to me.The situation will only change when there are graceful exits rather than pinkslips.
